o zone login
  1. You are at:
  2. Home
  3. Forms
  4. Changes to the quality assurance of osteopathic education

Changes to the quality assurance of osteopathic education

Please read the consultation document before completing this form.

 

We are asking some specific questions that we would like responses to, but you are welcome to offer any comments you wish. All feedback will be taken into consideration.

 

We will publish a report about the consultation and the responses we have received. If you would prefer your response not to be made public, please indicate this when sending us your views.

 

The deadline for responses to this consultation is 17 May 2018.

 

We look forward to receiving your comments; thank you.

Questions about you

We would also like to ask some questions about you. Completing the diversity questionnaire is optional, but we would welcome information about our respondents. The information you provide will only be used for the purposes of analysing the consultation responses.

 

Consultation questions

Optional.

Removal of RQ expiry dates
3. Do you agree with the proposal to remove RQ expiry dates and to award RQs which are not subject to specific conditions for an indefinite period?

Optional.

4. Do you agree that expiry dates should be retained for new institutions or for those institutions which may not be delivering the Osteopathic Practice Standards?

Optional.

Optional.

Publication of conditions or requirements
6. Do you agree that it would be appropriate to treat all types of conditions, requirements and recommendations as having the same status and using the same term?

Optional.

7. Do you agree that there should be greater transparency in terms of publishing these conditions?

Optional.

Optional.

Optional.

Optional.

Optional.

Procedure for dealing with concerns about osteopathic education
12. Is the draft Procedure for dealing with concerns about osteopathic education at Appendix 2 clear and accessible?

Optional.

13. Do you have any suggestions about how the process might be more fair, effective or comprehensive?

Optional.

14. Would it be appropriate to publish information about concerns if findings were upheld and conditions were imposed?

Optional.

Optional.

Optional.

Quality enhancement

Optional.

Optional.

18. Do you think it would be appropriate to publish good practice alongside conditions?

Optional.

Risk-based quality assurance
19. Do you agree that it would be appropriate for the GOsC to move to a more risk-based approach for its quality assurance of osteopathic education?

Optional.

Optional.

Optional.

22. How should the GOsC’s approach to quality assurance of undergraduate and pre-registration education and training be adapted for a risk-based approach?

Optional.

Optional.

Optional.

Last step